|
Home
- Mark Purdey
- Tributes - Mark Purdey's
Book ' Animal Pharm' - Articles -
Science
- Research Fund - News - Politics |
|
|
|
Trail:
Articles
|
Mark
Purdey Chronic
Wasting Disease of deer is much the same as scrapie in sheep. It is a
traditional variant of the
spongiform encephalopathy (TSE)
range of diseases; a previously unheard of neurodegenerative syndrome
made famous by the outbreak of mad cow disease in the UK . Seven
per cent of the free ranging/captive deer and elk population residing
along a 100 mile length of the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains in
North Colorado and South East Wyoming have been affected with this
disease for several years now. Originally identified as a TSE in the
late 1970's by veterinary neuropathologist, Professor Beth Williams, the
disease could have been endemic for many decades. Any rancher or hunter
who had noticed these ailing deer hobbling around the place, had
probably put such cases down to premature ageing or some ‘weakling’
wasting condition. The
origins of hyper infectious hysteria. Despite
the long term tradition of CWD haunting the Front Range foothills, a
surge of near hysteria has bestruck the official US wildlife departments
whose job it is to preside over CWD. Following in the footsteps of the
official furore over mad cow disease in Europe, the US government has
sadly adopted the same unproven hypothetical mindset on the origins of
these diseases; that TSEs stem from exposure to hyper infectious ‘prions’ that are readily transmitted via body to body contact (saliva, etc), or via ‘prion’ contaminated feed. In this respect,
blame has been conveniently offloaded onto the deer themselves – for
sharing the same feed troughs, etc, – or onto the hunters for
transporting the ‘infectious’ agent around with them from shooting
region to region. But
why has such a deeply flawed and scientifically inept theoretical
consensus been permitted ‘gospel’ status for such an unusually
protracted period of time? The launch of any new theory into the
notoriously sceptical scientific establishment invariably attracts a
fair degree of healthy challenge. But strangely enough with TSEs, there has
been an exception to this rule. This is largely because the UK
government has been actively engaged in tailoring or outright
suppressing, any publicity surrounding dissident scientific studies that
invalidate or even begin to threaten any aspect of the official
hypothesis. Furthermore, it is strange to witness the same old ‘masters of complacency’ in the higher echelons of UK
officialdom, suddenly adopting a high degree of hypersensitivity over
the way that they deal with their affairs. Such an incongruous style of
official behaviour has betrayed a deep level of insecurity over anything
that they are telling us on BSE. For
instance, nobody has been told that the British meat and bone meal (MBM)
feed that was held responsible for the massive BSE epidemic in the UK
has been exported by the cargo boat load, to cattle herds all over
the world since the 1960s - yet the majority of those countries have
never suffered a single case of BSE in their cattle herds to date. Nor
does anyone know about the 40,000 cases of BSE that have appeared in UK
cows that were born after the 1988 ban on MBM going into UK cattle feed.
In this respect, nearly a quarter of the total cases of BSE in Britain
cannot be explained by the conventional causal theory! In some BSE
endemic countries, more than half of their total BSE cases were born after their respective MBM bans.
Even my five year old son can see the stupidity of
such an obvious ‘cover story’.
To
escape the embarrassment of the outright failure of control measures,
the UK government set about hoodwinking the British public and their
foreign interests by creating a second feed ban in 1996;
whereupon they instructed their spin doctor journalists to
misappropriate blame for the unaccountable 40,000 cases of BSE onto ‘leakage
of micro amounts of MBM
left over in the feed silos getting into cattle feed’. They then gave
full coverage to the fact that the government were now banning the
inclusion of MBM going into feeds destined for all types of farm livestock. The 1988 ban was subsequently forgotten
and conveniently erased from the public memory banks. But today, 22
cases of BSE have now emerged that were born after this second 1996 ban! This
whole hyper infectious myth has been based on the fact that TSEs can be
transmitted in the laboratory; whereby TSE affected brain tissue is
injected into misfortunate laboratory animals that subsequently contract TSE. The fact that classes of
Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases can be transmitted in
this way is completely ignored. But
these transmission experiments prove nothing in terms of demonstrating
whether TSEs are caused by a microbiological infectious agent or not. After all
TSEs do not fulfil Koch’s postulates; the conventional
yardstick for assessing whether a given disease stems from infectious
origins. The
‘all important’ success of these ‘trumped up’ transmission
experiments could have equally easily represented the fact that a highly
toxic chemical or metal species which had originally contaminated and
killed the initial TSE diseased animal was then being transmitted into a
secondary host. Once again, this equally feasible alternative
explanation has been ignored. But
one of the first lines of epidemiological inquiry aimed at investigating the origins of CWD ought to have addressed the question why the disease has not
spread like wildfire, wiping out susceptible individuals of the deer
population residing right across the entire Rocky mountain ranges. But
whenever the likes of
rancher and hunting folk who live and breathe with the deer has
attempted to infiltrate the CWD debate, their intuitive and practical
perspectives on the disease have invariably been rebuffed by the
official and scientific policy makers. |
|
|
||
| Copyright
© Mark Purdey & Equofax
2002-2009 Comments and feedback to the webmaster |
|
Design by Equofax |